The Manchurian Candidate

Here is an interesting, and somewhat startling, piece from Kevin Hassett at Bloomberg.com.  Hassett explains that Obama's War (like Johnson's War on Poverty and Nixon's War on Drugs, etc) is a War on Business.  It is quite perceptive, and even common-sensical.  It's so obvious to me, who knows almost nothing about economics, and appears to be coming into clear focus in many economic settings, including here.  An excerpt:

"...Imagine that some hypothetical enemy state spent years preparing a “Manchurian Candidate” to destroy the U.S. economy once elected. What policies might that leader pursue?

He might discourage private capital from entering the financial sector by instructing his Treasury secretary to repeatedly promise a brilliant rescue plan, but never actually have one. Private firms, spooked by the thought of what government might do, would shy away from transactions altogether. If the secretary were smooth and played rope-a-dope long enough, the whole financial sector would be gone before voters could demand action.

Another diabolical idea would be to significantly increase taxes on whatever firms are still standing. That would require subterfuge, since increasing tax rates would be too obvious. Our Manchurian Candidate would have plenty of sophisticated ideas on changing the rules to get more revenue without increasing rates, such as auctioning off “permits.”

These steps would create near-term distress. If our Manchurian Candidate leader really wanted to knock the country down for good, he would have to provide insurance against any long-run recovery.

There are two steps to accomplish that...."




Blog Archive