Hospitality
Men And Women at Blockbuster
Well they came back my way as I had moved further down the wall and this time he pointed to a movie, explaining, "It's sort of a documentary." I didn't hear any response from her, but again she looked at the movie cover and walked away. Hearing the word "documentary", I interjected, "So does that mean the soundtrack sucks?" At this the man and I laughed out loud again.
Well, I made my way to the check out and happened to be right behind the couple. I didn't say anything but observed under the man's arm they had come to agree on the movie "What Happens in Vegas"! For those not familiar with this romantic comedy, it's basically about a couple who gets married in Vegas one night, but instead of allowing them to get divorced when they sober up and realize what they did, the judge forces them to stay married for 6 months first.
So much for cultural or educational viewing. But they tried. And I got a kick out of watching it.
another pesto recipe
food aug 30
greens and tomatoes and onions and garlic
food aug 29
PALIN!
food aug 28
Conflict of Interest
They recommend keeping LDL below 100 mg/dL, which would place tens of millions of Americans on statins.
I was reading Dr. John Briffa's blog today and he linked to a government web page disclosing NCEP panel members' conflicts of interest. It's fairly common in academic circles to require conflict of interest statements, so a skeptical audience can decide whether or not they think someone is biased. The 9-member NECP panel was happy to indulge us:
Every company in bold is a statin manufacturer. This is outrageous! These are the people setting official government blood cholesterol target values for the entire country! Eight out of nine of them should be dismissed immediately, and replaced by people who can do a better job of pretending to be impartial!Dr. Grundy has received honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Sankyo, Bayer, Merck/Schering-Plough, Kos, Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; he has received research grants from Merck, Abbott, and Glaxo Smith Kline.
Dr. Cleeman has no financial relationships to disclose.
Dr. Bairey Merz has received lecture honoraria from Pfizer, Merck, and Kos; she has served as a consultant for Pfizer, Bayer, and EHC (Merck); she has received unrestricted institutional grants for Continuing Medical Education from Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Novartis, Wyeth, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging; she has received a research grant from Merck; she has stock in Boston Scientific, IVAX, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, SCIPIE Insurance, ATS Medical, and Biosite.
Dr. Brewer has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lipid Sciences, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Fournier, Tularik, Esperion, and Novartis; he has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lipid Sciences, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Fournier, Tularik, Sankyo, and Novartis.
Dr. Clark has received honoraria for educational presentations from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Pfizer; he has received grant/research support from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Pfizer.
Dr. Hunninghake has received honoraria for consulting and speakers bureau from AstraZeneca, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, and Pfizer, and for consulting from Kos; he has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kos, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Novartis, and Pfizer.
Dr. Pasternak has served as a speaker for Pfizer, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Takeda, Kos, BMS-Sanofi, and Novartis; he has served as a consultant for Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Sanofi, Pfizer Health Solutions, Johnson & Johnson-Merck, and AstraZeneca.
Dr. Smith has received institutional research support from Merck; he has stock in Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson.
Dr. Stone has received honoraria for educational lectures from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kos, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Novartis, Pfizer, Reliant, and Sankyo; he has served as a consultant for Abbott, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Pfizer, and Reliant.
black bean and corn salad
aug 27 food
A World in Heat!
If we could learn to look instead of gawking,
We’d see the horror in the heart of farce,
If only we could act instead of talking,
We wouldn’t always end up on our arse.
This was the thing that nearly had us mastered;
Don’t yet rejoice in his defeat, you men!
Although the world stood up and stopped the bastard,
The bitch that bore him is in heat again.
Robinson and Long.com
food aug 24-26
Democrats, Abortion, and Journalism
“‘Surely we cannot be pleased with … millions of terminated pregnancies,’ Blake said to applause from the nearly full Wells Fargo Theater.”Maybe the media really does have a bias? Not really sure. So what actually happened: applause or silence?
“Schenck said the hall, filled with several thousand Democratic activists, fell uneasily silent as Blake spoke against abortion.”
Cult Leaders and Christian Pastors
Whenever someone approaches the Bible to "pull out" some practical application or insight, there is a very real danger that the flesh, as opposed to the spirit, is relied upon to communicate. It may be a good-intentioned pastor or a malicious, deceptive cult leader, but the end result is still the same: declaring that the Bible says something it really doesn't.
When a pastor does not take the time to study, to perform due diligence on a text, but rather finds a unique comment, verse, or phrase in Scripture and expounds on it as if it is a spiritual insight or biblical truth, he is no different than a cult leader who intentionally manipulates a text to accomplish his own purposes.
There is an additional component that must be addressed, however. The response of the people may be as equally enthusiastic or sincere in both cases because people simply are that way. Jesus described us as sheep (even sheep without a shepherd). Sheep rely on a shepherd, whether true or false, to lead them to provision and offer protection. There is an implicit trust in a leader.
But even more than this is a general desire of the people to hear from God. If a spiritual leader stands up to declare some insight or truth with articulate persuasion, the initial response of hunger to receive what God has for them, combined with a trust in the leader, provides a huge platform for the flesh to display itself. Again, this dynamic is the present both when a Christian pastor or a cult leader speaks.
So how does a Christian pastor guard against being merely a benevolent cult leader? By saying only what the Bible says. By refusing to rely on his flesh, and by giving the only spiritual words that s/he has to offer: an accurate, clear, explanation of God's spoken Word. Anything more, or less, than this is simply using the Word for his own purposes. And regardless if those purposes are well-intentioned, they are still HIS purposes and not God's.
As a preacher, offering our hearers what comes out of our flesh may move THEIR flesh (whether intellectual stimulation, emotional response, or physical applause), but it cannot move their spirit. To move the people's spirit, to effect their spiritual life, requires a work of the spirit.
Day in Napa Valley
We started the day at the North end of the valley, visiting Sterling, which I highly recommend. They have a tram that takes you up to their winery at the top of the foothills, and provides an incredible view!
They also have a video presentation at various locations throughout the self-guided tour that gives a lot of information about wine-making in general. This tour was my favorite, and at $15 for 5 tastings, it really is the best bang for your buck, with the view as a great bonus!
- We then drove 5 minutes over to the recently-opened, 100,000 square-foot, $37 million "Castle". This winery was built to add the Tuscany feel to Napa, which I think it does quite successfully.
- Napa is a wonderful place, well-worth a visit.
- There are so many vineyards and tours to be done that there is no way to see it all. It has to be done over a week-long vacation or several day trips, for those of us who live close enough.
- The North end of the valley is much more quaint and picturesque than the Southern end, which seems to be more flat and "business"-faced.
- I'm not a fan of red wine (which gets its color from the skin that is left in the barrel, as opposed to the white, which gets it simply from the juice of the grape). I most enjoyed the sweet, dessert wines (which get their sweetness, in part, by leaving the grapes on the vine longer).
- Bring some crackers, chips, or something to snack on in the car between tours (especially if you only sample the wine without cheese or appetizers - the cheap way). This will help you keep your wits about you and help you finish the day strong!
- I now have a greater understanding of the grapes, the process, and all the variables that add to the process of making a great wine. It was a very enjoyable, educational, and aesthetic experience. Two thumbs up!
At this point we definitely needed some food so we stopped by a great restaurant that had a "Barbecue Today" sign out front.
We then drove down to Robert Mondavi Wineries, the namesake of the "father and founder of the American Fine Wine Industry." Compared to the others, this was predominantly a vineyard, consisting of over 500 acres. Yes, there was the tasting, but the vineyards were the main attraction.
We rounded out the day with a stop at Domaine Chandon, a champagne vineyard. We got there with only about 45 minutes before they closed to host a wedding, so sorry for no pictures. However, this was more of a chic club/salon environment and the ambiance was more appealing than the view, for the most part.
A few take-aways from my day:
why am I doing this?
aug. 23 food
aug 19-23 food
Don't Waste Your Humor
Good Sportsmanship
God Heard His Prayer
"During the days of Jesus' life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission. Although he was a son, he learned obedience from what he suffered..."The amazing thing is that Jesus "learned obedience." He wasn't disobedient, but, as John Piper explains, he learned "a greater yieldedness to God" through what he suffered. But the phrase that jumped out at me was "and he was heard...." He prayed to be saved from death, and he was heard?!? So God heard his prayer, but answered "No". That's the easy answer to explain this. But beyond that, the fact that it says God heard his prayer is just a sobering statement in the midst of the suffering. God heard him. God was there to say, "I hear you."
Generally, when the Bible records that a particular prayer was heard, it implies that the answer, the thing requested/prayed for, was granted. Maybe that should cause us to reconsider what Jesus' prayer was. It may not be that he was praying to be spared the experience of death, but rather that his death would not be the end of the story; that he would be saved out of it.
This would be a very insightful understanding of the event, especially if we hold that "and his prayer was heard" means what it has meant in other places. The insight would be regarding what Jesus prayed and not how we might pray if we are in the same situation. Food for thought as we consider how to pray and how our Lord prayed.
If There Is No God - Dennis Prager
Answers to Evil and Suffering
I'm Yours - Jason Mraz
Hymns
Life Begins at Conception According to the Experts
Dr. Hymie Gordon (Mayo Clinic): “By all criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”
Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth (Harvard University Medical School): “It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”
Dr. Alfred Bongioanni (University of Pennsylvania): “I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception.”
Dr. Jerome LeJeune, “the Father of Modern Genetics” (University of Descartes, Paris): “To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion . . . it is plain experimental evidence.”
Rick Warren: At what point does a baby get human rights in your view?
Sen. Barack Obama: Well, I think that whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade.
aug 18 food
avocado butter
food aug 17
The Story
Solzhenitsyn
Here is the whole speech as well as a commentary by Chuck Colson with links to other articles.Today it is impossible to deny that Solzhenitsyn was correct about the “evil empire,” and his role in exposing it and bringing it down. But there is another side to Solzhenitsyn that has been largely ignored, and this is his critique of certain trends in Western civilization. Solzhenitsyn raised this subject, no less controversial and for us closer to home, in his famous 1978 Harvard address.
Even though he was second to none in his denunciation of totalitarian socialism, Solzhenitsyn said, "Should someone ask me whether I would indicate the West such as it is today as a model to my country, frankly I would have to answer negatively." The whole address is worth reading, but here are some highlights.
On what has happened to the rule of law: "People in the West has acquired considerable skill in using, interpreting and manipulating law....If one is right from a legal point of view, nothing more is required, nobody might mention that one could still not be entirely right and urge a willingness to show restraint or sacrifice. Everybody operates at the extreme limits of those legal frames....A society without any objective legal scale is a terrible one indeed, but a society with no other scale but the legal one is not quite worthy of man either."
We don't have to agree with Solzhenitsyn on everything to say that, far from being a reactionary, here was a man who was ahead of his time in diagnosing some of the serious ailments of the modern era. Not only was he right about the Gulag; in many respects this forlorn Russian hermit was also right about us.
Here is also a recent post from my friend Jeremy with two extended quotes from Solzhenitsyn regarding war. Well worth reading!
Side Benefits of Eating Healthy
aug 16 food
cabbage salad
Aug 14-15 food
Aug 15 rambling
chive spread for corn on the cob
Aug. 7-13 food
What a Preacher Sees
oatmeal
Aug. 6 food
fruit salad
Steamed potatoes
Aug 5 food
cashew-orange dressing
boiled sweet corn
Aug 4 food
Liberals and Character - A Study
The article identifies that character has been a more conservative issue, however "progressives" are now taking a second look at this issue considering that:
"...inequality of character may now be as important as inequality of economic resources. The specific concerns of progressives can be divided into three connected themes: the link between character attributes and life chances; the life chances "penalty" being paid by the children who do not develop a good character; and the growing demand for good character in the labour market."Among the conclusions,
"So if there has been a corrosion of character—and the poor have been disproportionately hit—who is the villain of the piece? Historically, the left has blamed capitalism; Marx's exploration of "alienation" is an early example. But during the 20th century, concern has shifted from the labour market to the product market, with fears about the character-sapping effects of materialism and consumerism. The right, by contrast, points the finger at the loosening of social norms and constraints associated with the 1960s. Of course, there is some cross-dressing here, on both sides: Blair attacked some elements of 1960s liberalism and Cameron is a critic of corporate irresponsibility. But each side, in its own way, blames liberalism: for the right, the social liberalism symbolised by the 1960s; for the left, the market liberalism associated with the 1980s.And the final paragraph deserves a hearty "AMEN":
...
If market liberalism cannot be convincingly blamed for corroding character, what about social liberalism? Has the loosening of laws on divorce, abortion, contraception and homosexuality undermined character? Here the liberal defence is weaker: principally because of the influence of greater individual freedom on some aspects of family life.
...
Nonetheless, the liberalisation of attitudes has done some damage. The "anything goes" mentality has sometimes translated into a reluctance to pass judgement on the actions of our peers, even when they are clearly wrong. Communitarian critics of liberalism such as Michael Sandel and Alasdair Macintyre argue that individualism has crowded out virtue and morality: the regulation of public behaviour is one area where they are right.
Moreover, the impact of social liberalism may have damaged character development in the most important place of all: the family. The necessary sacrifices of good parenting collide with the assumption that the individual is entitled to lead his or her life only by reference to their own desires. Parenting is a sacrificial, self-negating activity, and not all adults are up to the job. Finding the time, energy and commitment that needs to be spent over decades to raise a child well is tough. This has always been the case—and it should be noted that most parents now spend more time with their children than in previous generations. But the assumption that parents can have it all is entirely at odds with the reality of successful child-rearing. One of the most positive developments of the last half century is the entry of women into the labour market, but it has, of course, subtracted from the time and commitment to making homes and children, and men have seldom stepped in to fill the gap.
The liberal ambivalence about authority is also problematic in the family setting. "One of the key things about a family that works well is the in-built hierarchy," says Julia Margo. "The ideal sort of family for character development is two adult parents and older siblings who are well behaved. Then there are opportunities for purposeful activities: a family holiday with joint activities, or regularly playing football in the park. Family mealtimes, and having meaningful conversations with parents, are particularly important."
In other words, "traditional" families make the best character factories. Parental authority is important, especially when children are young. Taking part in traditional activities like Sunday lunch is not nostalgia, just good parenting. And of course, anyone concerned with character must be concerned with family breakdown. It is harder to be a good parent alone. Not impossible, of course. But it is a fact that divorce or separation is where individual freedom collides most dramatically with the collective need for our children to be well brought up. It is not obvious how public policy can help parents stay together. But at least some politicians are talking about it."
"Character is an old idea with contemporary relevance. A considerable number of pressing social problems—obesity, welfare reform, pensions, public disorder, educational failure, social immobility—are all, in part, questions of character. It is a treacherous political terrain, but one in which governments are increasingly entangled. Anyone who is interested in creating a successful liberal society is interested in character too, whether they admit it or not. Good societies need good people."
Insight From Dennis Miller on Iraq Victory
I think it will look like the last time we dealt with radical terrorists, say, like the Japanese in WWII, who were willing to dive airplanes into our navy ships at Pearl Harbor. Their view of the world was so different from ours that it would have seemed impossible to create any "Western" - looking society, let alone a democracy, out of Japan. Yet, 60 years later American Baseball played its season opener in Japan! It may take 60 years, but I think that's what victory in Iraq will look like. It will be buying the best computer or radio in the world with "Made in Iraq" stamped on it.
"Guy Church"
For example, ""We wanted it to feel like some guy's really, really cool home," albeit one with lots of high tech and a staff videographer, says David Parker, 121's associate pastor for worship and creative arts."
This seems to reflect a "Willowcreek" approach to church, which will only produce a consumerist mentality and a different problem in another 20 years. What about actually thinking through what the Church is supposed to be about and then designing what we do based on what God intended it to be, not some "really, really cool" hunting lodge, or video arcade, or any such thing.
Aug. 3 food log
popcorn with chocolate maple syrup flavor
July 30 - Aug. 2 food
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(404)
-
▼
August
(56)
- Hospitality
- Men And Women at Blockbuster
- another pesto recipe
- food aug 30
- greens and tomatoes and onions and garlic
- food aug 29
- PALIN!
- food aug 28
- Conflict of Interest
- black bean and corn salad
- aug 27 food
- A World in Heat!
- Robinson and Long.com
- food aug 24-26
- Democrats, Abortion, and Journalism
- Cult Leaders and Christian Pastors
- Day in Napa Valley
- why am I doing this?
- aug. 23 food
- aug 19-23 food
- Don't Waste Your Humor
- Good Sportsmanship
- God Heard His Prayer
- If There Is No God - Dennis Prager
- Answers to Evil and Suffering
- I'm Yours - Jason Mraz
- Hymns
- Life Begins at Conception According to the Experts
- aug 18 food
- avocado butter
- food aug 17
- The Story
- Solzhenitsyn
- Side Benefits of Eating Healthy
- aug 16 food
- cabbage salad
- Aug 14-15 food
- Aug 15 rambling
- chive spread for corn on the cob
- Aug. 7-13 food
- What a Preacher Sees
- oatmeal
- Aug. 6 food
- fruit salad
- Steamed potatoes
- Aug 5 food
- cashew-orange dressing
- boiled sweet corn
- Aug 4 food
- BO Dollar Bill
- Liberals and Character - A Study
- Insight From Dennis Miller on Iraq Victory
- "Guy Church"
- Aug. 3 food log
- popcorn with chocolate maple syrup flavor
- July 30 - Aug. 2 food
-
▼
August
(56)